How Split Test­ing Will Boost Your Con­ver­sion Rates And Profits

Imag­ine you had two dif­fer­ent ads cre­ated for you. How do you know which one is likely to pro­duce the bet­ter re­sponse? The only way is split test­ing them and com­par­ing the re­sults. Imag­ine you had two dif­fer­ent sales let­ters cre­ated for you. How do you know which one is likely to pro­duce the bet­ter re­sponse? The only way is split test­ing them and com­par­ing the re­sults. In 1886, re­tail busi­ness­man John Wana­maker fa­mously quipped, „I know that 50% of my ad­ver­tis­ing is wasted. I just don’t know which half.” But the truth is much worse. In fact, most ad­ver­tis­ing is wasted, be­cause most ad­ver­tis­ing is not based on what’s been proven to work. So to go back to my ear­lier ques­tion: how do you know which ad will per­form bet­ter? To an­swer that ques­tion, you must first have a his­tory of test re­sults. That is, you must have a pretty good idea as to what types of el­e­ments in an ad pro­duce the best re­sponse, based on real-world tests.

  • Not what you think or I think what will do best.
  • Not your mother or next-door neighbor.
  • Not even the mil­lion dol­lar ad agencies.

In fact, no­body would re­ally know what to fo­cus on, UNLESS they had ac­cess to these proven test re­sults. And in or­der to get these test re­sults, there would have to be some way to specif­i­cally mea­sure the re­sults of any given ad. We would need to know which types of el­e­ments per­formed well and which did not. Then we could an­a­lyze the ads and de­ter­mine the com­mon tech­niques used among the suc­cess­ful ones. Well, for­tu­nately much of this work has been al­ready done for you. There are over a hun­dred years of his­tory on ad­ver­tis­ing test re­sults in which you can base your as­sump­tions. So if you knew which kinds of ads per­formed bet­ter, then you might be able to take an ed­u­cated guess as to which of the two ads would per­form bet­ter than the other. Of course, that kind of in­for­ma­tion is just a “start­ing point.” You still need to split test your own ads. That means you’ll be us­ing 2 or more ver­sions of your ad, sales let­ter or what­ever and com­pare their con­ver­sion rate. The one that’s bet­ter is the win­ner. Once you have your win­ner, you im­me­di­ately start test­ing him against an­other ad. In the ‘split test­ing’ ar­ti­cles on this in­ter­net busi­ness blog I’m go­ing to show you how to test your own sales let­ter the right way, so you can cut the dogs loose and go with the win­ners every time. No mat­ter how suc­cess­ful your sales let­ter is, I can’t stress the im­por­tance enough of test­ing it to im­prove it even fur­ther. Some­times the tini­est tweak can be re­spon­si­ble for boost­ing a sales letter’s con­ver­sion rate con­sid­er­ably. But how will you ever find out which tweaks those are un­less you split test them?

  • Some­times it’s fairly ob­vi­ous what you could do to im­prove their response.
  • Other times what we may think will work bet­ter can ac­tu­ally make things worse. In the end it doesn’t mat­ter what you or I or other copy­writ­ers think.

It only mat­ters what your prospects think, and they weigh in on how much they like your head­line or of­fer by pur­chas­ing and be­com­ing a customer.

The equiv­a­lent of print­ing money on demand.

Re­mem­ber, the name of the game is to al­ways try to beat your con­trol (your for­mer win­ner and best-per­­for­m­ing sales let­ter). Once you have a proven sales let­ter, it truly is money in the bank. When you know your av­er­age re­sponse rate, you can pre­dict what get­ting more of the same kinds of prospects to your web­site will do to your bot­tom line. When you get right down to it, who wouldn’t want their av­er­age con­ver­sion rate to be as high as pos­si­ble? I don’t know of any­one who wants a lower con­ver­sion rate, but I do know plenty of peo­ple who don’t test. Whether they re­al­ize it or not, they are set­tling for less than they’re ca­pa­ble of achiev­ing. With a good mar­ket­ing fun­nel in place, you ide­ally want to match each mes­sage you por­tray to your market’s de­sires. That means every­thing from the ini­tial pay per click (PPC) ad, ar­ti­cle, ezine ad, or what­ever method you use to fun­nel traf­fic to your site—all the way on down the line. Everything.

  1. Your opt-in­­/­­name squeeze page
  2. Your email au­tore­spon­der sequence
  3. Your au­dio and video podcasts
  4. Your tele­sem­i­nars
  5. And cer­tainly your sales page

You see, the real pur­pose of test­ing is to de­velop the most prof­itable mar­ket­ing fun­nel. So you test all el­e­ments of your fun­nel, not just the en­try point. It’s easy to see that each tiny in­crease in one part of the fun­nel will MULTIPLY with all other im­prove­ments of the other parts of your mar­ket­ing fun­nel. That’s ‘com­pounded’ split test­ing profit.