WARNING - Don’t Get Banned From YouTube Or Fall 4 Vaporware

From Willie Craw­ford.

Willie Crawford

Ac­cord­ing to this ar­ti­cle in USA to­day, YouTube has 5.5 bil­lion streams and 58.1% of the on­line video mar­ket: https://tinyurl.com/WhyYouTubeMatters

That means that if you use video in your mar­ket­ing, you def­i­nitely want your videos on YouTube. Hav­ing your videos on YouTube, when prop­erly sub­mit­ted, of­ten gets you top po­si­tions for your keywords.

Like many mar­keters, I sub­mit to a va­ri­ety of video shar­ing sites. Yet, just as with search en­gines, only a hand­ful get the vast ma­jor­ity of traffic.

As an In­ter­net mar­keter, we’ve been con­di­tioned to fo­cus on quan­tity. That is, sub­mit­ting to as many sites as prac­ti­cal. How­ever, that may not be the best approach.

Flash­ing back a few years, there were many search en­gine sub­mis­sion ser­vices that of­fered to sub­mit your url to over 1000 of the top search en­gines. The re­al­ity was that there were fewer than 10 search en­gines that mat­tered, and sub­mit­ting to many of the other low qual­ity places could ac­tu­ally HURT your rank­ing in Google (or the top search en­gines at the time).

YouTube has be­come such an ex­cel­lent source of traf­fic that many mar­keters have be­gun mar­ket­ing too ag­gres­sively, and YouTube is strik­ing back. This blog post by Jeff Schechter ex­plains the prob­lem nicely: https://tr.im/UToob

Ba­si­cally, YouTube is notic­ing that a lot of users com­pletely ig­nore their terms of ser­vice, „by cre­at­ing mul­ti­ple ac­counts, over­load­ing tags and key­words at the ex­pense of con­tent, us­ing ‘friend get­ter’ type soft­wares, and a host of other ‘black hat’ tactics.”

Many top In­ter­net mar­ket­ing, and net­work mar­ket­ing train­ers have taught us­ing these ag­gres­sive tac­tics. So have many of the lead­ing video shar­ing sites. In fact, ac­cord­ing to the blog post above, the top dog in au­to­mated video sub­mis­sions, Traf­fic Geyser, has got­ten many YouTube users’ ac­counts shut down.

Now, I use au­to­mated video sub­mis­sions my­self. In fact, I am part owner of an au­to­mated video, au­dio, ar­ti­cle and press re­lease sub­mis­sion ser­vice. That ser­vice is called Easy Push But­ton Traf­fic. I be­came part owner be­cause I loved how easy and re­li­ably the soft­ware works.

I also wanted to give my clients an af­ford­able tool that WOULDN’T get them banned.

I no­ticed that many of the other ser­vices were en­cour­ag­ing users to do things like „spin­ning” con­tent or sub­mit­ting the same video re­peat­edly, only giv­ing them dif­fer­ent ti­tles and descriptions.

You may ask what’s wrong with that? It harms the video shar­ing sites by de­creas­ing the qual­ity of user ex­pe­ri­ences (dri­ving users to other sites). A per­son watches a video on a topic, and then looks for re­lated videos. They watch a sec­ond video with a dif­fer­ent ti­tle and de­scrip­tion, only to dis­cover that it’s the SAME video. Those users nat­u­rally com­plain to the video shar­ing sites, and the video shar­ing sites nat­u­rally strike back BANNING those who sub­mit­ted the videos.

At Easy Push But­ton Traf­fic, we own­ers took a dif­fer­ent ap­proach. We in­sisted on pro­tect­ing our cus­tomers even if they don’t know that they need pro­tect­ing. We use what Jay Abra­ham calls his „Strat­egy of Pre­em­i­nence” - putting the clien­t’s best in­ter­est FIRST!

It’s ab­solutely CRIMINAL to us to al­low one of our users to spend weeks or even months set­ting up a video cam­paign to gen­er­ate traf­fic and brand their prod­ucts, only to have YouTube and the other sites delete their work when they no­tice black­hat tactics.

We in­sisted upon be­ing 100% white hat… even when our cus­tomers of­ten asked for black­hat capabilities.

Easy Push But­ton Traf­fic bucked the trend in an­other area. While many video sub­mis­sion ser­vices were adding as many sub­mis­sion sites as pos­si­ble, we in­sisted on ONLY sub­mit­ting to the top sites that mat­ter and gen­er­ate traf­fic for our tar­get market.

Just as the search en­gine sub­mis­sion ser­vices ad­ver­tis­ing that they sub­mit­ted to over 1000 places of­ten sub­mit­ted to link farms, or free-for-all pages on porn sites, many of the video sites also cater pri­mar­ily to porn, re­al­ity tele­vi­sion type ma­te­r­ial, and stuff that pri­mar­ily in­ter­ested teenagers.

Hav­ing your video on many of these sites will ac­tu­ally HURT your Google rank­ing. Google owns YouTube in­ci­den­tally, and their al­go­ry­thm does con­sider where your videos are streamed from!

What mat­ters most when us­ing an au­to­mated sub­mis­sion ser­vice is how many qual­ity sites will ac­tu­ally ac­cept and pub­lish your sub­mis­sions. It’s also im­por­tant how much traf­fic those sites get.

We’ve sub­scribed to most of our com­peti­tors ser­vices, just to test them out. We of­ten sub­mit­ted videos, ar­ti­cles, etc., and then logged in a day or two later to see which ones ac­tu­ally were dis­play­ing our con­tent. With some of the lead­ing ser­vices, less than HALF of the sites that we had reg­is­tered for, and prop­erly sub­mit­ted to, ac­cepted or dis­played our submissions.

We had to won­der why none of the other cus­tomers of these ser­vices did­n’t no­tice that they were largely buy­ing va­por­ware. If their sub­mis­sion weren’t go­ing through and the cus­tomers weren’t even notic­ing, we had to con­clude that they merely logged in to the con­trol panel at the ser­vices, glanced at the „sub­mis­sion records” but never con­firmed that the sub­mis­sions were ac­tu­ally phys­i­cally on the sites!

One of the dif­fi­cul­ties with au­to­mated sub­mis­sions is keep­ing up with the chang­ing sub­mis­sion rules, and the in­ter­faces at the var­i­ous sub­mis­sion sites. That’s ac­tu­ally a full-time job, and prob­a­bly why many of the sub­mis­sion from many of the lead­ing sub­mis­sion ser­vices don’t go through. They don’t keep up with the changes.

Most of these sites are set up for in­di­vid­u­als to man­u­ally sub­mit. They of­ten don’t mind au­to­mated sub­mis­sions, since they need the con­tent for their users, as long as the sub­mis­sions are within cer­tain guidelines.

Easy Push But­ton Traf­fic ac­tu­ally uses pro­pri­ety soft­ware and tech­nol­ogy that was un­der de­vel­op­ment for a VERY long time, and Our team of pro­gram­mers are con­stantly up­dat­ing it. This al­lows us to sub­mit to the video, pod­cast, ar­ti­cle, and press re­lease sites in a way that makes it look the same as an in­di­vid­ual vis­it­ing the sites.

If you are us­ing a video, ar­ti­cle, pod­cast or press re­lease sub­mis­sion ser­vice, you ABSOLUTELY should phys­i­cally visit some of the sites peridi­cally and ver­ify that your sub­mis­sion are phys­i­cally there.

What you dis­cover may shock you.

One of the other things that shocked us as we set up Easy Push But­ton Traf­fic, and stud­ied our com­peti­tors, was how over-priced they were. We could only con­clude that they charged such ridicu­lous prices be­cause they had no real com­peti­tors. When you have no com­peti­tors, you can charge mo­nop­oly prices.

As we looked at pric­ing, looked at the fact that many of our client would be strug­gling en­tre­pre­neurs try­ing to get a busi­ness off the ground so that they could quit a 9-to-5 job that they hated, we de­cide to charge a more rea­son­able rate. In fact, we de­cided to ini­tially price our ser­vice at roughly 14th of what the big dogs charged for their lower-priced op­tions. We crunched the num­bers and saw that we could still make a profit do­ing that.

I’ve ram­bled on long enough, but did want to en­cour­age you to check out Easy Push But­ton Traf­fic. You will dis­cover that it is the very best value for the money. Your sub­mis­sions will get through, they’ll be on sites that send you rel­e­vant traf­fic, and if you’re one of the next 750 clients, it will only cost you $27 per month.

Do your busi­ness a huge fa­vor - take a minute now and check out: https://ibmm.com/epbt

------------------

Willie Craw­ford is an in­ter­net mar­ket­ing and traf­fic gen­er­a­tion ex­pert. He of­ten dis­trib­utes con­tent (ar­ti­cles, videos, pod­casts, and press re­leases) to gen­er­ate highly tar­geted web­site traf­fic. To do that ef­fi­ciently he uses the au­to­mated sub­mis­sion ser­vice that you’ll find at https://ibmm.com/epbt

To help you suc­ceed Willie has cre­ated The In­ter­net Mar­ket­ing In­ner Cir­cle, a mem­ber­ship site where he fre­quently brain­storms so­lu­tions to prob­lems such as those dis­cussed in this ar­ti­cle. Join that dis­cus­sion for your suc­cess at TheIn­ter­net­Mar­ketingIn­ner­cir­cle.